Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Pages

An optimistic observation for publishers around ebooks

Posted: February 8th, 2009, by Mike Shatzkin

OK, here’s an optimistic observation for publishers.

Let’s say more and more real book readers find, “you know, reading on this iPhone, Android, smartphone I have is pretty good…” And the marketplace for reading on the phones grows quickly. Plenty of skeptics for that idea, sure. But not impossible. (Keep this in mind: three doublings make ebooks 8% of the market. Will that happen in 3 years? It certainly couldn’t take as long as five…)

Let’s further say that iPhone does not end up owning the world, and iPhone and Blackberry find themselves competing on everything — including “aps” and, of course, including books, with Nokia, Dell, Google Android, etc. And let’s say that (at least for a very long time) each device and screen and market channel creates enough need for some proprietary tweak that we add admin, tech, quality control, and a host of sales and marketing issues to be dealt with by the publishers and distributors. Seems like’s what’s happening.

And let’s say that multiple developers will create competing platforms to run on all those phones. We know about Stanza and Scrollmotion Iceberg for the the iPhone right now. Amazon bought Mobipocket specifically because it was multi-system compatible, which at that point meant it could play on both Microsoft dot lit and Palm PDAs. We already have a complicated distribution system with Ingram Digital and Content Reserve as the principal distributors to get publishers to online retailers and libraries, but not really putting you on Kindle or iPhone.

Just seems to me that ePub can’t solve all these problems automatically. I’m sure it will be a big help, but opportunities to complicate things are arising faster than standards can be created to keep up with them.

If sales of digital files become significant AND they are maximized only by managing the technology, deals, and marketing at a wide variety of major accounts, it is a good thing for publishers and for DADs (digital asset distributors). And, parallel to the physical marketplace, it will be interesting to see what tradeoffs develop between handling an account through a distributor and managing it directly. No doubt the technology pieces will prove to be best handled by an aggregator or consolidator, but the quality control and product marketing opportunities will be aspects publishers will want to control.

Why is this good for publishers? Because the key way publishers ADD VALUE is by managing a complex set of revenue opportunities. To the degree that almost all the sales take place in Barnes & Noble and Amazon, plus what you can get from Ingram and Baker & Taylor, it weakens the publisher’s core competitive and value proposition. If ebook sales take off in a highly fragmented way, which now seems to at least be a possibility, it will drive the standards and interopability and efficiency wonks absolutely crazy, but it will give a lot of publishers some very constructive work to do.

1 Response to An optimistic observation for publishers around ebooks

  1. bowerbird

    i’m sure corporate publishers will find ways to
    spend money. after all, they are good at that…

    gotta raise overhead on each and every book,
    as a tax shield for the occasional blockbuster…

    and hey, being _big_ is what dinosaurs do best;
    $1500 conferences on what’s “new” this quarter.

    but let me tell you what the mammals will do…

    they will be authors who shun any middlemen.

    they’ll release their books, for free, to the wild.
    they’ll use free tools to connect to their readers.

    they’ll find fans who’ll feed back gifts to them,
    repeat-readers who will await their new work…

    they’ll nurture a relationship with those people,
    form a strong bond between author and reader.

    they’ll communicate with them in ways that will
    transcend the superficial hype found elsewhere,
    and in doing that, help create an honest world,
    which serves our needs better than the old one.

    they’ll do hard work to build long-term careers,
    _careers_ that will mock the ever-transient and
    fleeting nature of “this month’s best-sellers”…

    they will laugh when corporate bookstores fall
    like dominos. brick-and-mortar? yeah, right…
    a better description would be a house of cards.
    didn’t you notice all the record-stores closed?
    what made you think you were any different?

    they will understand, deeply within their d.n.a.,
    that we need to go to the roots of storytelling,
    that we need to recover our _basic_humanity_,
    and they will scoff at the stupidity of the notion
    this is all “managing” or “deals” or “marketing”,
    or “a complex set of revenue opportunities”…

    they will give away their books — free! — yet
    make more money than most authors ever did,
    and it will be money their fans gave voluntarily,
    _after_ they read the book. no more scam jobs.

    they will entice those fans to be _collaborators_
    – and the fans will be _thrilled_ to participate.
    somebody out there has a photograph that will
    be a great illustration to accompany some page,
    and that someone will appear with that photo…
    their fans will happily furnish error-reports, so
    the books quickly move to a state of perfection
    that they couldn’t obtain with “quality-control”
    even if they were willing to pay a bundle for it.

    readers love authors, and authors love readers.
    it’ll be like church, without any priest scandals.
    churches have lived for centuries on donations.

    get a clue-train. it’s all about the conversation.

    there is dialog happening, and happening now.
    a one-way monologue doesn’t cut it any more…

    and nobody has to go through any gatekeepers
    to reach an audience any more. that’s just silly.

    and — on some level — you know it, and well…

    after all, you put this on a blog, didn’t you?
    you didn’t turn it into a book, find an agent,
    seek out a publisher, and have it all “vetted”.

    you wrote it up, you put it out there, and now
    you’ve got feedback, whether you like it or not.

    so, by your very own actions, you have shown
    that you have absolutely no need for publishers.

    neither does anyone else…

    -bowerbird