<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Decline and Fall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pubfrontier.com/2009/02/03/decline-and-fall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pubfrontier.com/2009/02/03/decline-and-fall/</link>
	<description>A raucous public discussion of the publishing revolution.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 21:20:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Meadows</title>
		<link>http://pubfrontier.com/2009/02/03/decline-and-fall/comment-page-1/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Meadows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 19:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pubfrontier.com/?p=98#comment-329</guid>
		<description>In re Amazon getting desperate at the success of the iPhone reading programs.

Here&#039;s an interesting thing. In a conversation I had with an industry insider (who spoke on condition of anonymity), I was told an interesting thing. This person told me that Mobipocket (now a subsidiary company of Amazon), who had promised in May 2008 to have an official iPhone Mobipocket reader client out by the end of the year, had finished the reader  by August—but that Amazon was sitting on them, not permitting them to release it.

Though there are other readers (such as Bookshelf) that read Mobipocket books on the iPhone, none of them will read DRM-encrypted books the way an official Mobipocket reader could. Thus, the lack of a Mobipocket reader app for the iPhone means that all the stores that sell DRM-locked Mobipocket books (and all the locked books an iPhone owner might already have bought from when he had something else) are useless to an iPhone owner (unless he wants to break the law by removing the DRM).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In re Amazon getting desperate at the success of the iPhone reading programs.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an interesting thing. In a conversation I had with an industry insider (who spoke on condition of anonymity), I was told an interesting thing. This person told me that Mobipocket (now a subsidiary company of Amazon), who had promised in May 2008 to have an official iPhone Mobipocket reader client out by the end of the year, had finished the reader  by August—but that Amazon was sitting on them, not permitting them to release it.</p>
<p>Though there are other readers (such as Bookshelf) that read Mobipocket books on the iPhone, none of them will read DRM-encrypted books the way an official Mobipocket reader could. Thus, the lack of a Mobipocket reader app for the iPhone means that all the stores that sell DRM-locked Mobipocket books (and all the locked books an iPhone owner might already have bought from when he had something else) are useless to an iPhone owner (unless he wants to break the law by removing the DRM).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bowerbird</title>
		<link>http://pubfrontier.com/2009/02/03/decline-and-fall/comment-page-1/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>bowerbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pubfrontier.com/?p=98#comment-328</guid>
		<description>once again, joe, you got it wrong.

and not just wrong, but spectacularly wrong.

amazon won&#039;t last forever -- nothing does --
and i can totally see entities nibbling its edges,
picking niches and specializing to superiority.

but to posit that something cobbled together
and outsourced, something that is &quot;not good,
but good enough&quot; can displace it?  that&#039;s silly.
it would be quite comical to see anyone try it.
unfortunately, i don&#039;t think anyone is so stupid.

the only thing in &quot;decliine&quot; here is your spelling.

-bowerbird</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>once again, joe, you got it wrong.</p>
<p>and not just wrong, but spectacularly wrong.</p>
<p>amazon won&#8217;t last forever &#8212; nothing does &#8211;<br />
and i can totally see entities nibbling its edges,<br />
picking niches and specializing to superiority.</p>
<p>but to posit that something cobbled together<br />
and outsourced, something that is &#8220;not good,<br />
but good enough&#8221; can displace it?  that&#8217;s silly.<br />
it would be quite comical to see anyone try it.<br />
unfortunately, i don&#8217;t think anyone is so stupid.</p>
<p>the only thing in &#8220;decliine&#8221; here is your spelling.</p>
<p>-bowerbird</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Holman</title>
		<link>http://pubfrontier.com/2009/02/03/decline-and-fall/comment-page-1/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Holman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pubfrontier.com/?p=98#comment-327</guid>
		<description>Lot&#039;s of interesting points here, and certainly Amazon has no more right to survive than failing publishers or other cmpanies if it doesn&#039;t offer what consumers find valuable and needed. However to a large extent I believe this has been allowed to happen (mostly via inaction or plain acceptance of the status quo), enabling Amazon&#039;s original purpose for fulfillment to emerge as a full fledged content host and author-to-customer content platform. 

You are very much right to say it is easy to set up a book store with free or very cheap components - although as you say Amazon could still be involved via Amazon Web Services (storage via S3 - as well as EC2, and simpleDB). I think it is just a case of people just doing it. 

Amazon became the platform, problem with that is it becomes much much harder to dislodge a platform if every that want&#039;s to dislodge it is perched firmly atop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lot&#8217;s of interesting points here, and certainly Amazon has no more right to survive than failing publishers or other cmpanies if it doesn&#8217;t offer what consumers find valuable and needed. However to a large extent I believe this has been allowed to happen (mostly via inaction or plain acceptance of the status quo), enabling Amazon&#8217;s original purpose for fulfillment to emerge as a full fledged content host and author-to-customer content platform. </p>
<p>You are very much right to say it is easy to set up a book store with free or very cheap components &#8211; although as you say Amazon could still be involved via Amazon Web Services (storage via S3 &#8211; as well as EC2, and simpleDB). I think it is just a case of people just doing it. </p>
<p>Amazon became the platform, problem with that is it becomes much much harder to dislodge a platform if every that want&#8217;s to dislodge it is perched firmly atop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
